Which practice should be avoided when developing provisioning tests?

Testing using real production identities should be avoided because it poses significant risks to the integrity and security of sensitive data. When real production identities are involved, there is a substantial chance that test scenarios could inadvertently modify or affect actual user accounts, resulting in potential data breaches, unauthorized access, or compliance violations.

Provisioning tests should be conducted in a controlled environment where synthetic or anonymized identities are utilized instead. This minimizes risks associated with testing, as it ensures that the test operations do not impact real users or the functionality of the production environment. Using mocking or staging data not only protects user privacy but also allows for more flexible testing iterations without the constraints associated with live data.

Other practices, such as including rollback logic, using a staging environment for testing, and documenting all test scenarios thoroughly, are essential practices that contribute positively to the testing process. These strategies ensure that tests are repeatable, reversible, and well-understood, leading to improved reliability and effectiveness in the development of provisioning systems.