Which of the following is a legitimate approver type for access requests?

The choice identifying the owner of the entitlement as a legitimate approver type for access requests is correct because this role is typically designated with the responsibility of managing and controlling access to specific resources or data within the organization. The owner of the entitlement is usually someone who understands the implications of granting access and is therefore equipped to make an informed decision about whether or not a request should be approved.

In an access governance framework, the owner is accountable for ensuring that access aligns with the organization's security policies and that unnecessary permissions are not granted. This enhances the overall security posture by introducing a layer of scrutiny that is crucial for maintaining compliance and reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

Roles such as role-based approvers might be legitimate in some contexts, but they typically don’t have the specific oversight for individual entitlements that the owner does. Random team members lack the authority and understanding needed to make informed access decisions, and while helpdesk technicians might assist users, they are generally not in a position to approve access requests, depending on the organization’s access management policies. Thus, identifying the entitlement owner as the approver reinforces accountability and ensures that access decisions are well-considered and appropriately managed.