Which access control allows for effective management of certification campaigns?

The management of certification campaigns in the context of identity security is fundamentally about ensuring that those involved in the process have the appropriate level of access to perform their roles effectively. Granting permissions to view and edit campaigns is critical because it allows designated users—such as administrators and auditors—to oversee and manage the campaigns properly. This access ensures they can monitor progress, make necessary adjustments, and address any issues that arise during the certification process.

When users can view the campaigns, they can assess how well the certifications are proceeding and provide feedback or corrective measures as needed. Additionally, allowing users to edit campaigns means they can fine-tune the criteria, update participant lists, and modify timelines in response to organizational needs or compliance requirements. This level of involvement is essential for the successful execution and oversight of certification campaigns, making it the most effective choice to facilitate their management.

The other options do not offer this level of targeted control or oversight. Limited access to all users would restrict necessary involvement from key players, generic access would mean that there could be uncontrolled changes made by any user, and role downgrading for security does not directly relate to the management of campaign certification as it implies a reduction of access rather than a constructive way to manage campaigns.