What is a valid configuration for handling overdue certification escalations?

Choosing to configure escalation to the next-level manager after a set period, such as three days, is a valid approach for handling overdue certification escalations. This strategy provides a structured method for accountability, ensuring that overdue actions are appropriately escalated within a defined timeframe. It promotes timely decision-making and helps maintain compliance with governance policies, as it ensures that certifications do not go unchecked and are addressed in a timely manner.

The notion of escalating to a next-level manager signifies a proactive approach, creating a sense of urgency and encouraging prompt reviews by those with the responsibility to ensure compliance. This helps mitigate risks associated with delayed certifier actions and supports a well-managed identity governance process.

The other options may not provide the same level of effectiveness in managing overdue certifications. For instance, notifying certifiers only once lacks a follow-up mechanism, potentially allowing overdue items to fall through the cracks. Allowing certifiers to extend deadlines indefinitely could lead to perpetual delays and a lack of accountability, undermining the certification process. Moreover, limiting escalations to selected user segments may unintentionally exclude important areas of oversight and can lead to gaps in compliance monitoring.