Should certification campaigns be simulated using test users for effective access management testing?

Simulating certification campaigns using test users for effective access management testing is indeed recognized as a best practice. This approach allows organizations to evaluate their access management processes without jeopardizing the security and privacy of real users' data. Using test users provides a controlled environment where the effectiveness of the processes can be assessed without any risk of unintended consequences, such as disabling access for actual users or exposing sensitive information.

Additionally, simulations can help in refining and optimizing the certification processes. They allow teams to identify potential issues, gather insights into the various workflows, and make necessary adjustments before rolling out changes or new applications in a live environment. This helps to ensure that when certification campaigns are conducted with real users, they are smooth and effective, minimizing disruptions.

In contrast, relying on real users for testing can lead to complications such as inadvertent disruption of their access, compliance issues, and the potential for real-world data exposure. Consequently, using test users is not only safer but also supports better preparation and training for managing access responsibly in a live scenario.