Is using the same account name format for all systems a best practice for provisioning?

Using the same account name format for all systems is indeed aligned with best practices for provisioning, primarily because it promotes consistency across platforms. Maintaining a uniform account name format aids in reducing complexity within identity and access management processes. It allows for easier recognition and retrieval of user identities across different systems, which is crucial for effective management, auditing, and reporting.

The consistency in account names facilitates automated provisioning and de-provisioning activities, enhancing operational efficiency. This uniformity can also ease the user's experience, as they will have a standardized way to reference their accounts, decreasing the chances of errors when they need to access different platforms.

Furthermore, having a standardized account naming convention reduces the burden associated with potential name changes that can arise from personal or organizational changes. When all accounts adhere to a consistent format, it simplifies management tasks and ensures that administrators can easily track and manage user accounts across various systems.

While the notion of confusion and correlation might seem valid points, they do not outweigh the benefits of consistency, clarity, and operational efficiency that come with standardized account naming conventions.