Is the provisioning behavior consistent across different role types when there are birthright and request-based provisioning?

The assertion that provisioning behavior is consistent across different role types when considering birthright and request-based provisioning is not accurate. In reality, provisioning mechanisms can differ significantly based on the role type involved.

In the context of identity governance, birthright roles typically refer to entitlements that users are automatically granted based on their attributes, such as job title or department. These roles are defined to ensure that users receive access to necessary resources without having to request it actively. Consequently, the provisioning for birthright roles is usually straightforward and follows established business rules.

In contrast, request-based provisioning involves users actively requesting access to certain resources or roles that they do not automatically receive. This process often includes approval workflows or other governance measures to ensure compliance and security. The provisioning behavior in these scenarios can be more complex, as it involves additional steps like authorization from managers or compliance officers.

Therefore, the provisioning of birthright roles and request-based roles is not identical and can vary based on the organization's policies, workflows, and the specific attributes tied to each role. Thus, there's a clear distinction between how users are provisioned depending on whether their roles are classified as birthright or request-based.