Is it advisable to prefer rules for all simple changes?

Choosing not to prefer rules for all simple changes reflects an understanding of best practices in identity management. Rules can introduce complexity and overhead that might not be justified for straightforward modifications.

When a change is simple and straightforward, using rules could lead to unnecessary complications in governance and maintenance, creating a scenario where the system becomes harder to manage or understand. Simple changes often do not require the enforcement mechanisms that rules provide, which are better suited for more complex scenarios where precise control and governance are necessary.

Moreover, over-reliance on rules can lead to performance impacts, as each rule may require processing power and time, potentially slowing down system responsiveness for tasks that could otherwise be accomplished more efficiently without formal rules. The key is to maintain clarity and usability, ensuring that the approach taken does not create unnecessary barriers for simple updates or modifications. This pragmatic approach prioritizes efficiency and practicality in managing identity security processes.